Two weeks ago it was my birthday weekend. This weekend it was Jane’s turn. Here’s what happened:
All photos Fujifilm X100T
1: Curry and playing games with friends. I’m officially the world’s worst Uno player, although it doesn’t help when everyone gangs up on you. But hey, I take it in good humour. Bastards.
4: Sunday afternoon in the pub with friends, for the sole purpose of showing the kids how not to behave. Children’s education is so important.
5: Lots of walking with the dogs.
Coco’s recovering from an operation, so she’s wearing a très chic little French number she just threw on. This is far more fashionable than the usual cone of shame. Is cultural appropriation OK when it’s dogs doing it?
She asked me if I had any regrets. I told her I was really sorry I hadn’t shot more Kodachrome.
A few days later, pondering the look on her face, I realised that might not have been the answer she was looking for.
But as film photographers, regrets and disappointments are what we’ve come to expect. As well as Kodachrome, I really wish I’d shot a load more of Fuji’s Black & White pack film before it bit the dust in 2014. Kodak’s Panatomic X is another one, although that’s mainly because it sounds like something out of a 1950s sci-fi film. And not hiring someone to follow me round and document my entire life in wonderfully wobbly Super 8 was clearly a mistake.
The good news is that these days film photography is once again in the ascendancy. New emulsions are emerging and old ones resurrected. But the first such disappointment for me personally was when Polaroid stopped making instant film in 2008.
Just because my SX-70 lay dormant for over a decade, doesn’t mean I stopped buying Polaroid books.
Back In An Instant
Most people know the story by now. At its peak in the mid-70s, an estimated one billion Polaroids were being shot each year. Yet fast forward two decades and the instant photography market was being devastated by digital. By 2008 Polaroid had called time and stopped making film for its cameras.
Enter The Impossible Project. They bought the production machinery from Polaroid for $3 million and leased part of the former Polaroid plant in Holland. But with no raw materials and suppliers, they effectively had to reinvent the film from scratch.
I’d been a Polaroid shooter for many years and I remember being excited that I might be able to continue. But it soon became clear that the price was prohibitive, and the early iterations of the film were extremely flakey. My camera was relegated to the back of the cupboard, where it would spend the next ten plus years.
Back To The Future
This year I thought it might be time to take another look. I’d heard the film was much improved. The price is still a bit eye-watering though; £17 per pack, and where the old Polaroid had ten shots per pack, now you only get 8. That’s about two quid a pop. Ouch. Whatever, let’s go crazy, I thought. But would my camera still be working?
The Impossible Project has now rebranded to Polaroid Originals
Polaroid SX-70 Sonar
The original SX-70 is a work of genius. A manual focus SLR that produces instant film and folds flat. At some point Polaroid thought that the autofocus malarky other manufacturers were putting in their cameras might catch on. Thus the Polaroid SX-70 Sonar was born.
It’s clear the bug-eyed autofocus component on top has just been grafted on to a standard SX-70. This has the disadvantage of making the folded camera an inch or so longer. But the autofocus itself is super-snappy, and the viewfinder large and bright. I’m assuming the focus works by chucking out sound waves until it hits something and measures the distance, although anyone who’s not a scientific moron may correct me on this. One thing I quickly realised was that if you attempt to shoot through a window the camera will focus on the glass. Fortunately, there’s a manual focus option.
I gave the rollers on the camera a quick clean and pushed in the film cartridge. Out came the dark slide with that familiar Polaroid whirrrr – a good sign.
Like the original film, the battery is in the film pack rather than the camera. But unlike the original which had an ISO of 100, the new film is ISO 160. As there’s no direct way to adjust the ISO on the camera, I thought I’d have to use the lighter/ darker wheel to compensate. But no. As you’ll see, the exposures are spot on. However, you’re going to need a lot of light to get sharp hand-held shots as the maximum aperture is f/8. Shutters speeds range from 1/75 to ten seconds.
Each shot takes up to about 15 minutes to fully develop, and it really needs to do this out of direct light to stop it being washed out. I have a small tin that I immediately pop the photo in.
So here we have it, my first pack of polaroids in over ten years. One thing’s for sure; there will be more.
All photos Polaroid SX-70 Sonar / Polaroid Originals SX-70 Color Film
Bertie at 11 weeks old, in a rare moment of stillness
A picnic in the park with my friend Delphine
Rosie and friend in amongst the dunes at West Wittering Beach
Coco dreaming of a future where she won’t get continually mugged by a puppy
‘Yes I know I’m cute, but try to take the ball and I’ll lick you to death’
Abney Park Cemetery, London
Nikolay, Dmitry & Sergey are some of the guys I’ve been working with in Baku. Taken in the airport car park. Oh, the glamour.
The risk of catastrophic and irreversible disaster is rising, implying potentially infinite costs of unmitigated climate change, including, in the extreme, human extinction.
In the run-up to the 2016 Brexit referendum, politician Michael Gove attempted to dismiss the negative economic forecasts. “People in this country have had enough of experts”, he famously said. These days, everybody considers themselves to be an expert. Whether it’s Brexit, Climate Change, or championship whist, the internet has allowed the democratisation of truth. Each of us is now entitled to our own version of the facts.
In my wayward youth when I was still smoking cigarettes, it was the evidence of Doctors rather than tobacco giants that convinced me to quit.
When CFCs were suspected of causing the hole in the ozone layer, I believed the scientists rather than the deodorant manufacturers.
I’m not an expert. I’m neither a scientist nor an academic. All I can do is put my trust in those that I find the most credible. Consequently, I’m going with the overwhelming majority of scientists who believe that immediate action on climate change is needed to avert serious consequences. This is in spite of what some bloke on Twitter says.
I broadly support the aims and methods of Extinction Rebellion. I support ‘using non-violent direct action to persuade governments to act justly on the Climate and Ecological Emergency’. And however unpopular they are in some quarters, I believe it’s having an impact.
And yes, they’ve caused a lot of inconvenience for many people. But in the future, if your grandchildren ask you why you’ve handed them such a mess, I don’t want you to have to tell them it was too inconvenient to do otherwise.
N.B. There’s a lot of photos here, but I spent two days with them and shot three rolls of film. Extinction Rebellion, Trafalgar Square, London / Nikon F90X & Nikon F100 / Kodak Tmax 400 / Developed in D76 +1